CVEdetails.com the ultimate security vulnerability data source
(e.g.: CVE-2009-1234 or 2010-1234 or 20101234)
Log In   Register
  What's the CVSS score of your company?
Vulnerability Feeds & WidgetsNew   www.itsecdb.com  

Security Vulnerabilities Published In 2020(Http Response Splitting)

Press ESC to close
# CVE ID CWE ID # of Exploits Vulnerability Type(s) Publish Date Update Date Score Gained Access Level Access Complexity Authentication Conf. Integ. Avail.
1 CVE-2020-15811 444 Http R.Spl. Bypass 2020-09-02 2021-03-04
4.0
None Remote Low ??? None Partial None
An issue was discovered in Squid before 4.13 and 5.x before 5.0.4. Due to incorrect data validation, HTTP Request Splitting attacks may succeed against HTTP and HTTPS traffic. This leads to cache poisoning. This allows any client, including browser scripts, to bypass local security and poison the browser cache and any downstream caches with content from an arbitrary source. Squid uses a string search instead of parsing the Transfer-Encoding header to find chunked encoding. This allows an attacker to hide a second request inside Transfer-Encoding: it is interpreted by Squid as chunked and split out into a second request delivered upstream. Squid will then deliver two distinct responses to the client, corrupting any downstream caches.
2 CVE-2020-11709 74 Http R.Spl. 2020-04-12 2020-04-13
5.0
None Remote Low Not required None Partial None
cpp-httplib through 0.5.8 does not filter \r\n in parameters passed into the set_redirect and set_header functions, which creates possibilities for CRLF injection and HTTP response splitting in some specific contexts.
3 CVE-2020-11703 74 Http R.Spl. 2020-04-12 2020-04-13
5.0
None Remote Low Not required None Partial None
An issue was discovered in ProVide (formerly zFTPServer) through 13.1. /ajax/GetInheritedProperties allows HTTP Response Splitting via the language parameter.
4 CVE-2020-7695 74 Http R.Spl. 2020-07-27 2020-07-29
5.0
None Remote Low Not required None Partial None
Uvicorn before 0.11.7 is vulnerable to HTTP response splitting. CRLF sequences are not escaped in the value of HTTP headers. Attackers can exploit this to add arbitrary headers to HTTP responses, or even return an arbitrary response body, whenever crafted input is used to construct HTTP headers.
5 CVE-2020-7622 Http R.Spl. 2020-04-06 2021-08-03
7.5
None Remote Low Not required Partial Partial Partial
This affects the package io.jooby:jooby-netty before 1.6.9, from 2.0.0 and before 2.2.1. The DefaultHttpHeaders is set to false which means it does not validates that the header isn't being abused for HTTP Response Splitting.
6 CVE-2020-6858 74 Http R.Spl. 2020-03-12 2020-03-17
4.3
None Remote Medium Not required None Partial None
Hotels Styx through 1.0.0.beta8 allows HTTP response splitting due to CRLF Injection. This is exploitable if untrusted user input can appear in a response header.
7 CVE-2020-6181 Http R.Spl. 2020-02-12 2020-02-21
5.0
None Remote Low Not required None Partial None
Under some circumstances the SAML SSO implementation in the SAP NetWeaver (SAP_BASIS versions 702, 730, 731, 740 and SAP ABAP Platform (SAP_BASIS versions 750, 751, 752, 753, 754), allows an attacker to include invalidated data in the HTTP response header sent to a Web user, leading to HTTP Response Splitting vulnerability.
8 CVE-2020-5249 74 XSS Http R.Spl. 2020-03-02 2020-04-09
4.0
None Remote Low ??? None Partial None
In Puma (RubyGem) before 4.3.3 and 3.12.4, if an application using Puma allows untrusted input in an early-hints header, an attacker can use a carriage return character to end the header and inject malicious content, such as additional headers or an entirely new response body. This vulnerability is known as HTTP Response Splitting. While not an attack in itself, response splitting is a vector for several other attacks, such as cross-site scripting (XSS). This is related to CVE-2020-5247, which fixed this vulnerability but only for regular responses. This has been fixed in 4.3.3 and 3.12.4.
9 CVE-2020-5247 74 XSS Http R.Spl. 2020-02-28 2020-04-09
5.0
None Remote Low Not required None Partial None
In Puma (RubyGem) before 4.3.2 and before 3.12.3, if an application using Puma allows untrusted input in a response header, an attacker can use newline characters (i.e. `CR`, `LF` or`/r`, `/n`) to end the header and inject malicious content, such as additional headers or an entirely new response body. This vulnerability is known as HTTP Response Splitting. While not an attack in itself, response splitting is a vector for several other attacks, such as cross-site scripting (XSS). This is related to CVE-2019-16254, which fixed this vulnerability for the WEBrick Ruby web server. This has been fixed in versions 4.3.2 and 3.12.3 by checking all headers for line endings and rejecting headers with those characters.
10 CVE-2019-19670 XSS Http R.Spl. 2020-02-10 2020-02-11
4.3
None Remote Medium Not required None Partial None
A HTTP Response Splitting vulnerability was identified in the Web Settings Component of Web File Manager in Rumpus FTP Server 8.2.9.1. A successful exploit can result in stored XSS, website defacement, etc. via ExtraHTTPHeader to RAPR/WebSettingsGeneralSet.html.
11 CVE-2019-16385 79 XSS Http R.Spl. 2020-06-04 2021-07-21
4.3
None Remote Medium Not required None Partial None
Cybele Thinfinity VirtualUI 2.5.17.2 allows HTTP response splitting via the mimetype parameter within a PDF viewer request, as demonstrated by an example.pdf?mimetype= substring. The victim user must load an application request to view a PDF, containing the malicious payload. This results in a reflected XSS payload being executed.
12 CVE-2019-10797 Http R.Spl. 2020-02-19 2020-03-02
4.3
None Remote Medium Not required None Partial None
Netty in WSO2 transport-http before v6.3.1 is vulnerable to HTTP Response Splitting due to HTTP Header validation being disabled.
13 CVE-2019-4552 XSS Http R.Spl. +Info 2020-10-15 2020-10-20
5.8
None Remote Medium Not required Partial Partial None
IBM Security Access Manager 9.0.7 and IBM Security Verify Access 10.0.0 are vulnerable to HTTP response splitting attacks. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability using specially-crafted URL to cause the server to return a split response, once the URL is clicked. This would allow the attacker to perform further attacks, such as Web cache poisoning, cross-site scripting, and possibly obtain sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 165960.
14 CVE-2015-3154 74 Http R.Spl. 2020-01-27 2020-01-30
4.3
None Remote Medium Not required None Partial None
CRLF injection vulnerability in Zend\Mail (Zend_Mail) in Zend Framework before 1.12.12, 2.x before 2.3.8, and 2.4.x before 2.4.1 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTTP headers and conduct HTTP response splitting attacks via CRLF sequences in the header of an email.
Total number of vulnerabilities : 14   Page : 1 (This Page)
CVE is a registred trademark of the MITRE Corporation and the authoritative source of CVE content is MITRE's CVE web site. CWE is a registred trademark of the MITRE Corporation and the authoritative source of CWE content is MITRE's CWE web site. OVAL is a registered trademark of The MITRE Corporation and the authoritative source of OVAL content is MITRE's OVAL web site.
Use of this information constitutes acceptance for use in an AS IS condition. There are NO warranties, implied or otherwise, with regard to this information or its use. Any use of this information is at the user's risk. It is the responsibility of user to evaluate the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information, opinion, advice or other content. EACH USER WILL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY consequences of his or her direct or indirect use of this web site. ALL WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND ARE EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMED. This site will NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT or any other kind of loss.