|
Security Vulnerabilities Related To CWE-297
# |
CVE ID
|
CWE ID
|
# of Exploits
|
Vulnerability Type(s)
|
Publish Date
|
Update Date
|
Score
|
Gained Access Level
|
Access
|
Complexity
|
Authentication
|
Conf.
|
Integ.
|
Avail.
|
1 |
CVE-2014-3522 |
297 |
|
|
2014-08-19 |
2018-10-30 |
4.0 |
None |
Remote |
High |
Not required |
Partial |
Partial |
None |
The Serf RA layer in Apache Subversion 1.4.0 through 1.7.x before 1.7.18 and 1.8.x before 1.8.10 does not properly handle wildcards in the Common Name (CN) or subjectAltName field of the X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers via a crafted certificate. |
2 |
CVE-2014-3603 |
297 |
|
|
2019-04-04 |
2019-04-08 |
4.3 |
None |
Remote |
Medium |
Not required |
None |
Partial |
None |
The (1) HttpResource and (2) FileBackedHttpResource implementations in Shibboleth Identity Provider (IdP) before 2.4.1 and OpenSAML Java 2.6.2 do not verify that the server hostname matches a domain name in the subject's Common Name (CN) or subjectAltName field of the X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers via an arbitrary valid certificate. |
3 |
CVE-2016-1280 |
297 |
|
Bypass |
2016-09-09 |
2017-09-01 |
6.4 |
None |
Remote |
Low |
Not required |
Partial |
Partial |
None |
PKId in Juniper Junos OS before 12.1X44-D52, 12.1X46 before 12.1X46-D37, 12.1X47 before 12.1X47-D30, 12.3 before 12.3R12, 12.3X48 before 12.3X48-D20, 13.3 before 13.3R10, 14.1 before 14.1R8, 14.1X53 before 14.1X53-D40, 14.2 before 14.2R7, 15.1 before 15.1R4, 15.1X49 before 15.1X49-D20, 15.1X53 before 15.1X53-D60, and 16.1 before 16.1R1 allow remote attackers to bypass an intended certificate validation mechanism via a self-signed certificate with an Issuer name that matches a valid CA certificate enrolled in Junos. |
4 |
CVE-2017-2911 |
297 |
|
|
2017-11-07 |
2022-04-19 |
2.6 |
None |
Remote |
High |
Not required |
None |
Partial |
None |
An exploitable vulnerability exists in the remote control functionality of Circle with Disney running firmware 2.0.1. SSL certificates for specific domain names can cause the rclient daemon to accept a different certificate than intended. An attacker can host an HTTPS server with this certificate to trigger this vulnerability. |
5 |
CVE-2017-2912 |
297 |
|
|
2017-11-07 |
2022-04-19 |
2.6 |
None |
Remote |
High |
Not required |
None |
Partial |
None |
An exploitable vulnerability exists in the remote control functionality of Circle with Disney running firmware 2.0.1. SSL certificates for specific domain names can cause the goclient daemon to accept a different certificate than intended. An attacker can host an HTTPS server with this certificate to trigger this vulnerability. |
6 |
CVE-2017-2913 |
297 |
|
|
2017-11-07 |
2022-04-19 |
2.6 |
None |
Remote |
High |
Not required |
None |
Partial |
None |
An exploitable vulnerability exists in the filtering functionality of Circle with Disney. SSL certificates for specific domain names can cause the Bluecoat library to accept a different certificate than intended. An attacker can host an HTTPS server with this certificate to trigger this vulnerability. |
7 |
CVE-2018-10936 |
297 |
|
|
2018-08-30 |
2020-10-15 |
6.8 |
None |
Remote |
Medium |
Not required |
Partial |
Partial |
Partial |
A weakness was found in postgresql-jdbc before version 42.2.5. It was possible to provide an SSL Factory and not check the host name if a host name verifier was not provided to the driver. This could lead to a condition where a man-in-the-middle attacker could masquerade as a trusted server by providing a certificate for the wrong host, as long as it was signed by a trusted CA. |
8 |
CVE-2020-14387 |
297 |
|
|
2021-05-27 |
2021-06-09 |
5.8 |
None |
Remote |
Medium |
Not required |
Partial |
Partial |
None |
A flaw was found in rsync in versions since 3.2.0pre1. Rsync improperly validates certificate with host mismatch vulnerability. A remote, unauthenticated attacker could exploit the flaw by performing a man-in-the-middle attack using a valid certificate for another hostname which could compromise confidentiality and integrity of data transmitted using rsync-ssl. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data confidentiality and integrity. This flaw affects rsync versions before 3.2.4. |
9 |
CVE-2020-15260 |
297 |
|
|
2021-03-10 |
2021-07-20 |
4.3 |
None |
Remote |
Medium |
Not required |
None |
Partial |
None |
PJSIP is a free and open source multimedia communication library written in C language implementing standard based protocols such as SIP, SDP, RTP, STUN, TURN, and ICE. In version 2.10 and earlier, PJSIP transport can be reused if they have the same IP address + port + protocol. However, this is insufficient for secure transport since it lacks remote hostname authentication. Suppose we have created a TLS connection to `sip.foo.com`, which has an IP address `100.1.1.1`. If we want to create a TLS connection to another hostname, say `sip.bar.com`, which has the same IP address, then it will reuse that existing connection, even though `100.1.1.1` does not have certificate to authenticate as `sip.bar.com`. The vulnerability allows for an insecure interaction without user awareness. It affects users who need access to connections to different destinations that translate to the same address, and allows man-in-the-middle attack if attacker can route a connection to another destination such as in the case of DNS spoofing. |
Total number of vulnerabilities : 9
Page :
1
(This Page)
|
|
CVE is a registred trademark of the MITRE Corporation and the authoritative source of CVE content is
MITRE's CVE web site.
CWE is a registred trademark of the MITRE Corporation and the authoritative source of CWE content is
MITRE's CWE web site.
OVAL is a registered trademark of The MITRE Corporation and the authoritative source of OVAL content is
MITRE's OVAL web site.
Use of this information constitutes acceptance for use in an AS IS condition.
There are NO warranties, implied or otherwise, with regard to this information or its use.
Any use of this information is at the user's risk.
It is the responsibility of user to evaluate the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information, opinion, advice or other content.
EACH USER WILL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY consequences of his or her direct or indirect use of this web site.
ALL WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND ARE EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMED. This site will NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT,
INDIRECT or any other kind of loss.