|
A program using swift-nio-http2 is vulnerable to a denial of service attack, caused by a network peer sending a specially crafted HPACK-encoded header block. This attack affects all swift-nio-http2 versions from 1.0.0 to 1.19.1. There are a number of implementation errors in the parsing of HPACK-encoded header blocks that allow maliciously crafted HPACK header blocks to cause crashes in processes using swift-nio-http2. Each of these crashes is triggered instead of an integer overflow. A malicious HPACK header block could be sent on any of the HPACK-carrying frames in a HTTP/2 connection (HEADERS and PUSH_PROMISE), at any position. Sending a HPACK header block does not require any special permission, so any HTTP/2 connection peer may send one. For clients, this means any server to which they connect may launch this attack. For servers, anyone they allow to connect to them may launch such an attack. The attack is low-effort: it takes very little resources to send an appropriately crafted field block. The impact on availability is high: receiving a frame carrying this field block immediately crashes the server, dropping all in-flight connections and causing the service to need to restart. It is straightforward for an attacker to repeatedly send appropriately crafted field blocks, so attackers require very few resources to achieve a substantial denial of service. The attack does not have any confidentiality or integrity risks in and of itself: swift-nio-http2 is parsing the field block in memory-safe code and the crash is triggered instead of an integer overflow. However, sudden process crashes can lead to violations of invariants in services, so it is possible that this attack can be used to trigger an error condition that has confidentiality or integrity risks. The risk can be mitigated if untrusted peers can be prevented from communicating with the service. This mitigation is not available to many services. The issue is fixed by rewriting the parsing code to correctly handle all conditions in the function. The principal issue was found by automated fuzzing by oss-fuzz, but several associated bugs in the same code were found by code audit and fixed at the same time
Publish Date : 2022-02-09 Last Update Date : 2022-02-22
-
CVSS Scores & Vulnerability Types
CVSS Score |
5.0 |
Confidentiality Impact |
None
(There is no impact to the confidentiality of the system.) |
Integrity Impact |
None
(There is no impact to the integrity of the system) |
Availability Impact |
Partial
(There is reduced performance or interruptions in resource availability.) |
Access Complexity |
Low
(Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. Very little knowledge or skill is required to exploit. ) |
Authentication |
Not required
(Authentication is not required to exploit the vulnerability.) |
Gained Access |
None |
Vulnerability Type(s) |
Denial Of ServiceOverflow |
CWE ID |
190 |
|
|
-
Products Affected By CVE-2022-24667
-
Number Of Affected Versions By Product
-
References For CVE-2022-24667
|
|
-
Metasploit Modules Related To CVE-2022-24667
|
|
|
|
CVE is a registred trademark of the MITRE Corporation and the authoritative source of CVE content is
MITRE's CVE web site.
CWE is a registred trademark of the MITRE Corporation and the authoritative source of CWE content is
MITRE's CWE web site.
OVAL is a registered trademark of The MITRE Corporation and the authoritative source of OVAL content is
MITRE's OVAL web site.
Use of this information constitutes acceptance for use in an AS IS condition.
There are NO warranties, implied or otherwise, with regard to this information or its use.
Any use of this information is at the user's risk.
It is the responsibility of user to evaluate the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information, opinion, advice or other content.
EACH USER WILL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY consequences of his or her direct or indirect use of this web site.
ALL WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND ARE EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMED. This site will NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT,
INDIRECT or any other kind of loss.